The many-faced film quality
https://doi.org/10.69975/2074-0832-2024-60-2-147-155
Abstract
For a film to be created and established as a social phenomenon, it must, to a certain extent, satisfy the needs of not only viewers, but also its authors, distributors, film exhibitors, investors and society. Hence the diverse quality of a film – spectator, aesthetic, commercial and cultural-ideological. From the complex of these qualities and the arrangement of value priorities in him, his integral social quality is formed.
Keywords
society,
film process,
needs,
artist,
audience,
distributor,
film exhibitor,
film quality,
legitimation,
Sociology of Cinema
About the Authors
M. I. Zhabskiy
FGBOU DPO «Academy of Media Industry»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mikhail I. Zhabskiy, Doctor of Sociology, Leading Researcher in Research Sector
AuthorID: 1426
К. А. Tarasov
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russian
Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Кirill А. Tarasov, Doctor of Culturology, Professor
AuthorID: 76496
References
1. Zhabskij, M.I. Sociologiya kino [The Sociology of Cinema]. Moscow, Kanon+ ROOI Reabilitaciya Publ., 2020. 512 p. (In Russ.)
2. Zhabskij, M.I., Tarasov, K.I. Rossijskaya sociologiya kino v kontekste razvitiya obshhestva [Russian Sociology of Cinema in the Context of Society Development]. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya, no. 4, 2019, pp. 73–81. (In Russ.)
3. Mezhgosudarstvenny`j standart. Upravlenie kachestvom produkcii. Osnovny`e ponyatiya, terminy` i opredeleniya [Interstate standard. Product quality management. Basic concepts, terms and definitions]. Available at: https://meganorm.ru (Accessed 16 March 2024). (In Russ.)
4. Tarkovskij, A. Lekcii po kinorezhissure [Lectures On Film Directing]. Lеningrad, Tipografiya kinostudii “Lenfil`m” Publ., 1989. 110 p. (In Russ.)
5. TOP-200 rossijskie relizy` 2022 goda [TOP-200 Russian releases of 2022]. Byulleten` kinoprokatchika, no. 1/2, 2023, p. 24. (In Russ.)
6. Bourdieu, P. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press,1984. 613 р.
7. Metz, Chr. Semiologie des Films. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1972. 329 p.
8. Prokop, D. Soziologie des Films. Frankfurt am Main, 1982. 374 p.
9. Sobchack, T., and Sobchack, V.C. An Introduction to Film. 2nd ed. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1987. 514 р.
10. Zur Diskussion gestellt: Niklas Luhmann, “Die Kunst der Gesellschaft”. Available at: https://www.soziale-systeme.ch (Accessed 16 March 2024).
Review
For citations:
Zhabskiy M.I., Tarasov К.А. The many-faced film quality. Vestnik VGIK. 2024;16(2(60)):147-155. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.69975/2074-0832-2024-60-2-147-155
Views:
115
Email this article 