The Concept of «Network Screen Image» in the Context of Screen Culture of the 2010s
EDN: ktmizs
Abstract
The article analyzes the influence of audiovisual content created by users of digital technology on non-fiction cinema. Our contemporaries take a rather active creative stand, often conveying their own common vision of reality.
Тechnical means of recording reality have become consumer orientated, thereby increasing the demand from the amateur audience for recording themselves and their environment.
A potential contemporary hero of a documentary can actively use network communication technologies and create digital content independently, reflecting his personal attitudes, which in the future may hinder the documentary recording of reality.
In most cases, in the Internet space, the modern user independently creates his own screen image, which should be defined as a «network screen image».
At the same time, for the most part, an amateur user who creates audiovisual content, focuses on the presentable appearance of his «network screen image», and therefore the content of «network screen image» acquires peculiar features that distinguish it from other images of screen culture.
It should be noted that certain difficulties in creating a non-fiction film can occur since the image of the hero of a documentary film can come into direct conflict with the attitudes of the hero who is concerned about the presentable appearance of the "network screen image". In his turn, the director risks coming under the influence of the hero's own presentation of his image on the networks. The article notes that the modern viewer, who is actively creating video content, could have formed his own «visual» consumer basket, and, despite the diversity of modern screen culture, common vision of reality becomes a significant obstacle on the way to the development of aesthetic perception.
About the Author
A. A. ShtandkeRussian Federation
Researcher
References
1. Aristotel'. (2021) Poetika. Ritorika [Aristotle. Poetics. Rhetoric] / Aristotel'; per. s dr.-grech. V.Appel'rota, N.Platonovoj. Sankt-Peterburg.: Azbuka-Attikus, 2021. 320 p. (In Russ.).
2. Arnhejm R. (2012) V parabolah solnechnogo sveta. Zametki ob iskusstve, psihologii i prochem [Notes on art, psychology and other things in the parabolas of sunlight. Notes on art, psychology, and more] / per. i predisl. V.P. SHestakova. — Sankt-Peterburg.: Aletejya, 2012. 104 p. (In Russ.).
3. Andrej Tarkovskij. (2017) Hudozhnik prostranstva [Andrey Tarkovsky. The artist of space] / pod redakciej I. Afanas'evoj // Al'manah. Vypusk 510. — Sankt-Peterburg: Palace Editions, FGBUK Gosudarstvennyj russkij muzej, 2017. 170 p. (In Russ.).
4. Dzhulaj L.N. (1998) Dokumental'noe kino — iskusstvo sleduyushchego tysyacheletiya [Documentary cinema is the art of the next millennium]. L. Dzhulaj // Iskusstvo kino, 1998. № 5. // URL.: http://old.kinoart.ru/archive/1998/05/n5-article22 (дата обращения: 16.06.2022).
5. Krivulya N.G. (2012) Ekrannaya kul'tura. Teoreticheskie problemy [Screen culture. Theoretical problems] / Otv. red. K.E. Razlogov. SPb.: «DMITRIJ BULANIN», 2012. 335 p. (In Russ.).
6. Merzlyakov R. Pokazhite dokumentyi. Rezhisser dokumentalynogo kino Sergej Miroshnichenko — o Gergieve, Zhzhenove, Daczyuke i «Rozhdennyix v SSSR». [Show me the documents. Documentary film director Sergey Miroshnichenko — about Gergiev, Zhzhenov, Datsyuk and "Born in the USSR] // URL.: https://rg.ru/2018/11/07/sergejmiroshnichenko-moi-geroi-sotvorcy-filma.html (дата обращения: 05.05.2021).
7. Razbezhkina M.A. (2012) Nachinaty nado so slozhnogo [It is necessary to start with the difficult] / M.A.Razbezhkina // — Moskva: Iskusstvo kino, 2012. № 1. Pр. 61-75. (In Russ.).
8. Razlogov K.EY. (2015) Planeta kino [Planet Cinema] / Razlogov K.EY. –M.: EYksmo, 2015. 408 p. (In Russ.).
9. Tak vidit neigrovoe kino, iskusstvo i zhizn' rezhisser Tofik SHahverdiev. Neigrovoe kino konchaetsya [This is how director Tofik Shakhverdiyev sees non-fiction cinema, art and life. The non-fiction movie ends] // URL.: http://ascinemadoc.ru/takmvidit-neigrovoe-kinoiskusstvo-i-zhizn-rezhisser-tofik-shahverdiev/ (дата обращения: 07.10.2021).
10. Hlyzova A.A. (2013) Smyslovye skhodstva i razlichiya ponyatij «audiovizual'nyj obraz», «ekrannyj obraz», «televizionnyj obraz» i «hudozhestvennyj obraz» v kontekste ih ispol'zovaniya v teorii i praktiki televideniya. [Semantic similarities and differences between the concepts of “audiovisual image”, “screen image”, “television image” and “artistic image” in the context of their use in the theory and practice of television] / Nauchnoe mnenie: nauchnyj zhurnal / Sankt-Peterburgskij universitetskij konsorcium. — Sankt-Peterburg: 2013. №11. Pp. 78-85. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Shtandke A.A. The Concept of «Network Screen Image» in the Context of Screen Culture of the 2010s. Vestnik VGIK. 2022;14(3(53)):59-69. (In Russ.) EDN: ktmizs