Literary Allusions in Animated Films as a Form of Intertextuality
EDN: hcaode
Abstract
The research is devoted to the study of literary allusions in animated films, the determination of the specific aspects of their use and functions.
The allusions to literary texts used in animation can be implicit and explicit in nature and can vary in size. They are elements of intertextuality. Literary allusions structure the film both as a complex, multifaceted text, and as an ironic, parody game of the authors with the audience.
They not only form the subtext of the animated film, but also perform various functions, including plot-forming, evaluative-characterizing, comic. A screen product with literary allusions, being an example of diversified structure, cannot be attributed exclusively to an elite or mass type of art.
The use of literary allusions is not so common in modern animation compared to other types of allusions. This is due to the fact that deciphering a literary allusion requires a certain cultural background on the part of the viewer, in other words, he or she should be well-read.
Since the reading level of the modern viewer is declining, literary allusions used in films are becoming simpler. Structure-forming literary allusions are not so often used in animation, while fragmentary and deconstructed allusions, reduced to a recognizable or replicated literary phrase, become the most frequently used stylistic device.
The artistic practice of animation demonstrates that with the help of literary allusion and the techniques of postmodern poetics, it is possible, on the one hand, to create films that will be easily accessible to not only a person familiar with literature and art, but also to an average unsophisticated viewer, and on the other hand, to make a work of mass culture, which includes mainstream animation, interesting to a well-read viewer who is able to detect hidden meanings and an intertextual dialogue with texts of art and culture behind the exterior of the plot and action.
The incorporation of literary allusions into the structure of the film's artistic image contributes to the creation of a parody-game effect and opens up the possibility for a multiplicity of interpretations.
About the Author
N. G. KrivulyaRussian Federation
Doctor of Arts, Higher School (Department) of Television
Moscow
References
1. Bahtin M.M. (1975) Problema soderzhaniya, materiala i formy v slovesnom hudozhestvennom tvorchestve [The problem of content, material and form in verbal artistic creativity] // Bahtin M.M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki. — M.: Hudozhestvennaya literatura, 1975. Рр. 6–71. (In Russ.).
2. Bahtin M.M. (2002) Problemy tvorchestva Dostoevskogo [Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics] // Sobranie sochinenij: v 7 t. — M.: Russkie slovari, Yazyki slavyanskoj kul'tury, 2002 T. 6. Рр. 7–175. (In Russ.).
3. Vihrieva I.V. (2016) Recepciya «Alisy» L. Kerrolla v Sovetskom Soyuze: animacionnaya versiya [Reception of L. Carroll's Alice in the Soviet Union: animated version] // Mirovaya literatura na perekrestke kulytur i civilizacij, 2016. №-2 (14). Pp. 77–84. (In Russ.).
4. Galperin I.R. (2006) Tekst kak ob’ekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya [Text as an object of linguistic research] — M. : KomKniga, 2006. — 139 s. (In Russ.).
5. Dronova E.M. (2006) Stilisticheskij priem allyuzii v svete teorii intertekstualynosti: Na materiale yazyka anglo-irlandskoj dramy pervoj poloviny XX veka [Stylistic technique of allusion in the light of the theory of intertextuality: On the material of the language of the Anglo-Irish drama of the first half of the XX century]: avtoreferat dis. ... kandidata filologicheskih nauk: 10.02.04 / Voronezh. gos. un-t. Voronezh, 2006. 24 p. (in Russ.). 6. Dyurishin D. (1979) Teoriya sravnitelynogo izucheniya literatury [Theory of comparative literature study]. M.: Progress, 1979. 317 р. (In Russ.).
6. Ilyin I.P. (1996) Postrukturalizm, dekonstruktivizm, postmodernism [Poststructuralism, deconstructivism, postmodernism]. — M.: Intrada, 1996. — 453 p. (In Russ.).
7. Kristeva YU. (2004) Izbrannye trudy: Razrushenie poetiki [Selected works: The Destruction of Poetics]. — M.: «Rossijskaya politicheskaya enciklopediya» (ROSSPEN), 2004. — 656 р. (In Russ.).
8. Manykovskaya N.B. (2000) Estetika postmodernizma [Aesthetics of postmodernism]. — SPb.: Aletejya, 2000. — 347 p. (In Russ.).
9. Pyege-Gro N. (2008) Vvedenie v teoriyu intertekstualynosti [Introduction to the theory of intertextuality]. — M.: LKI, 2008. — 238 р. (In Russ.).
10. Semenova M.O. (2022) Allyuzii i ih klassifikaciya primenitel'no k sentiment– analizu [Allusions and their classification in relation to sentiment analysis]// Modern science: actual problems of the theory and practice. Philology. Series: Humanities, No. 1 January 2022. Pp. 193–199.
11. Tuhareli M.D. (1984) Allyuziya v sisteme hudozhestvennogo proizvedeniya: Dis. ... kand. filologicheskie nauki: 10.01.08. [Allusion in the system of an artwork]. — Tbilisi, 1984. — 168 s. (In Russ.).
12. Fateeva N.A. (2000) Kontrapunkt intertekstualynosti, ili Intertekst v mire tekstov [Counterpoint of intertextuality, or Intertext in the world of texts]. — M.: Agar, 2000. Pp. 122–129. (In Russ.).
13. Irwin W. (2001) What is an Allusion? // The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 2001. № 59 (3). Pp. 287–297.
14. Thomas R.F. (1986) Virgil's Georgics and the art of reference. Harvard Studies, 1986. — 171p.
Review
For citations:
Krivulya N.G. Literary Allusions in Animated Films as a Form of Intertextuality. Vestnik VGIK. 2022;14(3(53)):48-58. (In Russ.) EDN: hcaode