Interrelationship between Multichannel Sound Formats and the “Embodiment” in Cinema
https://doi.org/10.69975/2074-0832-2024-62-4-113-125
Abstract
The article investigates the connection between the use of multichannel sound formats and the development of film theory: in particular, the ability of surround sound to “immerse” the viewer in the narrative universe, evoking proprioceptive sensations with sound which gives a new impetus to the theory of “embodiment” developing in the paradigm of phenomenological aesthetics. New sound films not only put the viewer into a new acoustic environment, but also create parallel universes represented by sound and identified by the viewer as “material”, capable of not only causing a reaction, but also “finalizing” the image in the minds of viewers. Technological innovations in sound recording and sound reproduction due to the introduction of multichannel systems have led to the transformation of auditory perception and the emergence of an entirely new type of acoustic space. With film sound becoming more multi-layered and omnidirectional, the auditory component has been elaborated with synthesized textures as a result of sound design. The aesthetic potential and expressiveness of the “format” sound has broken a new ground in the progress of virtual reality in film and affected the viewer’s artistic perception of the latest works of screen art as well as the development of new theoretical ideas.
About the Author
E. A. RusinovaRussian Federation
Elena A. Rusinova, Doctor of Art Studies, Professor, Head of the Department of Sound Design
AuthorID: 424081
References
1. Aldoshina, I.A. Osnovy psihoakustiki [Fundamentals of psychoacoustics]. Available at: https:// booksee.org/book/485645 (Accessed 21 September 2024). (In Russ.)
2. Bimer В.: Smotret' kino mne hochetsya v poslednyuyu ochered' [The last thing I want to watch is a movie]. Available at: https://www.kinopoisk.ru/media/article/2286799/ (Accessed 1 October 2024). (In Russ.)
3. Bychkov, V.V., Man'kovskaya, N.B. Virtual'naya real'nost' kak fenomen sovremennogo iskusstva [Virtual reality as a phenomenon of modern art]. Estetika: Vchera. Segodnya. Vsegda. 2nd ed. Moscow, IF RAN Publ., 2006. 239 p. (In Russ.)
4. Iz istorii francuzskoj kinomysli. Nemoe kino. 1911–1933 [From the history of French cinema theory. Silent movies. 1911–1933]. ed. and transl. by M. YAmpol'skij. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1988. 317 p. (In Russ.)
5. Kazaryan, R.A. Estetika kinofonografii [Aesthetics of film phonography]. Moscow, FGOU DPO “IPK rabotnikov TV i RV”, ROF “Ejzenshtejnovskij centr issledovanij kul'tury” Publ., 2011. 248 p. (In Russ.)
6. Maklyuen, M. Zakony media [Media Laws], transl. by M.M. Kuznecov. Istoriya filosofii, no. 8, 2001, pp.125–162. (In Russ.)
7. Merlo-Ponti, M. Kino i novaya psihologiya [Cinema and the new psychology], transl. by M.B. YAmpol'skij. Kinovedcheskie zapiski, 1992. no. 16, pp. 13–22. (In Russ.)
8. Merlo-Ponti, M. Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya [Phenomenology of perception], тransl. by I.S. Vdovina, S.L. Fokin. Sankt-Petersburg, YUventa Publ., “Nauka” Publ., 1999. 606 p. (In Russ.)
9. Hvan, A. Pis'mo [Letter]. Iskusstvo kino, no. 11, 2002. Available at: https://old.kinoart.ru/archive/2002/11/n11-article13 (Accessed 1 October 2024). (In Russ.)
10. Hrenov, N.A. Izobrazitel'naya kul'tura v ee tradicionnyh formah v epohu vtorzheniya v kul'turu izobrazhenij, vozmozhnyh na tekhnologicheskoj osnove: ot opticheskih sposobov videniya k taktil'no-osyazatel'noj sisteme videniya [Visual culture in its traditional forms in the era of the invasion of the culture of images possible on a technological basis: from optical methods of vision to tactile vision system]. CHelovek v informacionnom prostranstve. Sbornik nauchnyh statej [A person in the information space. Collection of scientific articles]. YAroslavl', YAGPU im. K.D. Ushinskogo Publ., 2019. pp. 125–140. (In Russ.)
11. El'zesser, T., Hagener, M. Teoriya kino. Glaz, emocii, telo [The theory of cinema. The eye, the emotions, the body]. Sankt-Petersburg, Seans Publ., 2018. 440 p. (In Russ.)
12. YAmpol'skij, M.B. Vidimyj mir. Ocherki rannej kinofenomenologii [The visible world. Essays on early film phenomenology]. Moscow, NII Kinoiskusstva, Central'nyj muzej kino Publ., Mezhdunarodnaya kinoshkola Publ., 1993. 216 p. (In Russ.)
13. YAmpol'skij, M.B. Merlo-Ponti i kinoteoriya [Merlot-Ponty and cinema theory]. Kinovedcheskie zapiski, no. 16, 1992, pp. 23–29. (In Russ.)
14. Bernstein, P. Gravity' Composer Steven Price on Breaking New Ground to Score 'Fury'// IndieWire. Available at: http://www.indiewire.com/2014/10/gravity-composer-stevenprice-on-breaking-new-ground-to-score-fury-69154; The Sound of Gravity // SoundWorks Collection. Available at: http://soundworkscollection.com/videos/gravity (Accessed 03 October 2024).
15. Buhler, J. Theories of The Soundtrack. New York, Oxford University Press, 2019. 336 p.
16. Chion, M. 100 Concepts to Think and Describe Sound Cinema. Available at: http://michelchion.com/texts (Accessed 03 October 2024).
17. Ihde, D. Listening and Voice: Phenomenologies of Sound, Albany, State University of New York Press, 2007, 296 p.
18. Schreger, C. The Second Coming of Sound, Film Comment, 1978, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 34–37.
19. Sobchak, V. What My Fingers Knew: The Cinesthetic Subject, or Vision in the Flesh, Carnal Thoughts. Embodiment and Moving Image Culture. Berkeley, Los Angeles (CA), University of California Press, 2004, pp. 53–84
Review
For citations:
Rusinova E.A. Interrelationship between Multichannel Sound Formats and the “Embodiment” in Cinema. Vestnik VGIK. 2024;16(4(62)):113-125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.69975/2074-0832-2024-62-4-113-125