Preview

Vestnik VGIK

Advanced search

Split-screen Effects and Decadence Aesthetics in Peter Greenaway's Drowning by Numbers

EDN: drgwgm

Abstract

The author focuses on Peter Greenway's film Drowning by Numbers which all the while remained by and large off the researchers' radars. The full-fledged analysis of the film’s aesthetics implies revealing the mechanics of balancing the architectonics of film matter both in the semantic and the visual contexts, taking into account the redundancy of meanings, accents, various stylistic and genre elements typical for this director.
The split-screen as a tool for organizing the intra-frame matter is for P. Greenway a kind of brand identity. However, the director prefers not to limit his poetics to one genre and style, nor to a universal artistic device. In Drowning by Numbers there is no split-screen in its traditional sense, however, the architectonics of the film matter evidentiates its complex structure, semantic segmentation and strong correlation of the segments, which allows to regard the frame architectonics in the context of the split-screen effect with connotations inherent in the tool. Forming the intra-frame contents in such an unconventional way, Peter Greenaway intensifies and expands the film space without loading its visual solution; he creates a close “three-dimensional” structure, arranges the semantic strata, fits the objects in the exact grid of a frame. In Drowning by Numbers the split-screen effect with its implied boundaries holds up the multi-dimensional aesthetics of the film including elements of postmodernism, symbolism and, more so, of decadence — with its inherent fascination with death and non-existence, its abysm of the unconscious and its static beauty. Typically, the film's characters move slowly, strike attitudes and put others to death emotionless. It appears that the decadence aesthetics proves to be the most emphatic in this work, and that’s what implicitly requires a split-screen structure of the intra-frame space.

About the Author

V. D. Evallyo
State Institute for Art Studies
Russian Federation

PhD (Culture Studies), Senior Researcher, , executive secretary of the peer-reviewed scientific electronic journal “Art & Culture Studies”



References

1. Bychkov V.V. (2021). Simvol i simvolizaciya v iskusstve. Sovremennoe ekho estetiki simvolizma [Symbol and symbolization in art. A Modern Echo of Symbolist Aesthetics] // Bychkov V.V., Mankovskaya N.B. (2021). Estetika simvolizma [Aesthetics of symbolism]. Moskva, Sankt-Peterburg: Centr gumanitarnyh iniciativ, 2021. Pp. 561–577. (in Russ.).

2. German M. (2005) Modernizm. Iskusstvo pervoj poloviny XX veka [Modernism. Art of the first half of the XX century]. Sankt-Peterburg: Azbuka-klassika, 2005. 480 p. (in Russ.).

3. Zvezdina Yu.N. (1997) Emblematika v mire starinnogo natyurmorta. K probleme prochteniya simvola [Emblematics in the world of ancient still life. To the problem of reading the symbol]. Moskva: Nauka, 1997. 160 p. (in Russ.).

4. Kryuchkova V.A. (1999) Zhivopisy — teatr — kino. O vzaimodejstvii hudozhestvennyh form v iskusstve XX veka [Painting — theater — cinema. On the interaction of artistic forms in the art of the XX century] // Hudozhestvennye modeli mirozdaniya: V 2 t. Kn. 2: XX vek. Vzaimodejstvie iskusstv v poiskah novogo obraza mira [Artistic models of the universe: In 2 vols. Vol. 2: XX century. Interaction of arts in search of a new image of the world], Bobrova S.L., Ikonnikov A.V., Kirichenko E.I., etc.; ed. V.P.Tolstoj, etc. Moskva: NII RAH, 1999. Pp. 139–173. (in Russ.).

5. Mankovskaya N.B. (2011) Esteticheskaya specifika postmodernistskoj mifologii v kinoproektah Pitera Grinueya i Met'yu Barni [Aesthetic Specificity of Postmodern Mythology in the Film Projects of Peter Greenway and Matthew Barney] // Mif i hudozhestvennoe soznanie XX veka [Myth and artistic consciousness of the XX century], ed. N.A. Hrenov; Gos. in-t iskusstvoznaniya. Moskva: «Kanon+» ROOI «Reabilitaciya», 2011. Pp. 674–684. (in Russ.).

6. Ortega-i-Gaccet H. (1991) Estetika. Filosofiya kul'tury [Aesthetics. Philosophy of Culture], Vstup. st. G.M.Fridlendera; Sost. V.E. Bagno. Moskva: Iskusstvo, 1991. 588 p. (in Russ.).

7. Petrov M.A. (2017) Sladostnyj poisk sebya. “Novaya chuvstvennosty” v evropejskom kinematografe vtoroj poloviny XX — nachala XXI v. [Sweet search for yourself. “New Sensibility” in European Cinematography in the Second Half of the 20th — Early 21st Centuries] // Antropologiya iskusstva. Yazyk iskusstva i mera chelovecheskogo v menyayushchemsya mire [Anthropology of art. The language of art and the measure of the human in a changing world], ed. O.A. Krivtsun. Moskva: «Indrik», 2017. Pp. 287–301. (in Russ.).

8. Jenkins B. (2000) The Tickled Underbelly: Peter Greenaway and the Aesthetics of Ambivalence. Montreal: McGill University, 2000. 118 p.

9. Keesey D. (2006) The films of Peter Greenaway. Sex, Death and Provocation. McFarland & Company, Inc., Publoshers. Jefferson, North Carolina, and London, 2006. 239 p.

10. Peter Greenaway’s Postmodern (2008) // Poststructuralist Cinema. Revised Edition / Eds. P. Willoquet-Maricondi, M. Alemany-Galway. Lanham, MD/Toronto/Plymouth, UK: The Scarecrow Press, Inc., 2008. 447 p.


Review

For citations:


Evallyo V.D. Split-screen Effects and Decadence Aesthetics in Peter Greenaway's Drowning by Numbers. Vestnik VGIK. 2022;14(2(52)):86-98. (In Russ.) EDN: drgwgm

Views: 43


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2074-0832 (Print)
ISSN 2713-2471 (Online)