Preview

Vestnik VGIK

Advanced search

The Role of Memory in the Perception of the Screen Image

Abstract

The article deals with the methodological significance of defining the examined phenomenon, particularly, art. It is shown that the procedure is complex and ambiguous. The author analyses the principal types of the definition of art — empirical, metaphysical and institutional — and argues that the final definition of the notion «art» has not been found yet.

About the Author

Irina Petrovna Nikitina
VGIK
Russian Federation


References

1. Витгенштейн Л. Лекции и разговоры об эстетике, психологии и религиозной вере // Современная западноевропейская и американская эстетика. — М., 2000.

2. Грэм Г. Философия искусства. Введение в эстетику. — М., 2004.

3. Ивин А.А. Неясность. Неточность // Философия: Энциклопедический словарь. — М., 2004,2006.

4. Bell C. The Aesthetic Hypothesis. — London, 1985.

5. Dickie G. Art and the Aesthetic. An Institutional Analysis. — New York, 1974.


Review

For citations:


Nikitina I.P. The Role of Memory in the Perception of the Screen Image. Vestnik VGIK. 2012;4(2-3(12-13)):148-156. (In Russ.)

Views: 27


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2074-0832 (Print)
ISSN 2713-2471 (Online)