Preview

Vestnik VGIK

Advanced search

Modification of the Aesthetic-Semiotic Structure of Screen Culture: Historical Context

Abstract

The article examines the modernisation of screen culture’s aesthetic and semiotic structure based on the synthesis of technology and creativity.
The relevance of the problem lies in the fact that the existence of contemporary artistic culture is somehow connected with the transformations of media environment in the 20th–21st centuries where the screen acts as the main formgenerating “material medium”. Being a new communicative paradigm, screen (audio-visual) culture is a phenomenon of the information age, standing out from conventional arts. Screen production, represented today by old and new media, is global in nature, actively influencing the individual and the society and changing the socio-cultural space of the world.
The artistic-semiotic structure of screen culture in the course of its evolution has passed through three historical and aesthetical periods. The first one was the era of modernism whose aesthetics was closely connected with scientific and technological progress and the emergence of a new type of culture based on the synthesis of technology and creativity. The phenomenon in question is photography and cinema that outshone the centuries-old classical culture. The second period, which began in the 1960s–1970s, being associated with the formation of postmodernist aesthetics, was caused by the transition of culture from modernism to the information age, which brought it to an artistic deadlock due to the overabundance of information. The third period (the turn of the 20th– 21st centuries), connected with the transformation processes of globalisation and digitalisation, can be defined as “computer-centric”, where the forms of digital info-aesthetics prove to be most demanded in the cultural sphere.
Reflecting on the impact of computer technologies on screen culture, it should be noted that digital aesthetics changes human conscience and the way people perceive reality. That is why the study of this process is one of the most relevant tasks of the theory and practice of screen creativity.

About the Author

N. B. Kirillova
Ural Federal University named after B.N. Yeltsin
Russian Federation

Doctor of Cultural Studies, Professor, Chair of the Department of Cultural Studies and Socio-Cultural Activities



References

1. Bauman Z. (2002) Individualizirovannoe obshchestvo [Individualised society]. Per. s angl. V.L. Inozemceva. — Moskva: Logos, 2002. — 390 p. (In Russ.).

2. Ben'yamin V. (1996) Proizvedenie iskusstva v epohu ego tekhnicheskoj vosproizvodimosti [The work of art in the age of its technical reproducibility]. Izbr. esse. — Moskva: Medium:, 1996. — 240 p. (In Russ.).

3. Bol'c N. (2011) Azbuka media [ABC of Media]. — Moskva: Evropa, 2011. — 136 p. (In Russ.).

4. Vertov D. (1966) Stat'i. Dnevniki. Zamysly [Articles. Diaries. Intentions]. — Moskva: Iskusstvo, 1966. — 320 p. (In Russ.).

5. Dellyuk L. (1924) Fotogeniya kino [The photogeny of cinema]. — Moskva: Novye vekhi, 1924. — 164 p. (In Russ.).

6. Istoricheskaya kul'turologiya [Historical cultural studies], otv. red. E.A. SHulepova. — Moskva: Akademicheskij proekt; Al'ma Mater, 2015. — 795 p. (In Russ.).

7. Kastel's M. (2004) Galaktika Internet: Razmyshleniya ob Internete, biznese i obshchestve [Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business and Society]. — Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya, 2004. — 328 p. (In Russ.).

8. Kirillova N.B. (2022) Medialogiya: Nauka globalizovannogo mira [Medialogy: The Science of a Globalised World]. — Moskva: Akademicheskij proekt, 2022. — 420 p. (In Russ.).

9. Maklyuen G.S. (2003) Ponimanie media: Vneshnie rasshireniya cheloveka [Understanding Media: External Extensions of the Human Being ]. — Moskva-ZHukovskij: Kanon-Press-C, Kuchkovo Pole, 2003. — 464 p. (In Russ.).

10. Manovich L. (2017) Teorii soft-kul'tury [Soft-culture theories]. Per. s angl. A. Badoyan, N. Lebedevoj. — Nizhnij Novgorod: Krasnaya lastochka, 2017. — 208 p. (In Russ.).

11. Ekrannaya kul'tura. Teoreticheskie problem [Screen culture. Theoretical problems]. Sankt-Peterburg: Izd-vo Dmitrij Bulanin, 2012. (In Russ.).

12. Gere Ch. (2006) Genealogy of the computer screen // Visual Communication. 2006. № 5.

13. Huhtamo E. ( 2004) Elements of Screenology: Toward an Arhaeology of the Screen // ICONICS: International Studies of the Modern Image. 2004. Vol. 7. P. 31-82. Tokyo: The Japan Society of Image Arts and Sciences.

14. Manovich L.Z. (2013) Media after Software//Journal of visual Culture, Vol. 12 (1), 2013. P. 30–37.


Review

For citations:


Kirillova N.B. Modification of the Aesthetic-Semiotic Structure of Screen Culture: Historical Context. Vestnik VGIK. 2023;15(4(58)):84-95. (In Russ.)

Views: 34


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2074-0832 (Print)
ISSN 2713-2471 (Online)