Features of the Reception of G. Chaucer in P.P. Pasolini’s “The Canterbury Tales” (“The Reeve’s Tale”)
https://doi.org/10.69975/2074-0832-2025-66-4-67-79
Abstract
This article examines P.P. Pasolini’s approach to Chaucer’s text, describes the logic behind its transformation, and characterises the song repertoire in “The Reeve’s Tale”. While contrasting the crisis of contemporary bourgeois culture to the integ-rity of the Renaissance worldview, the director significantly alters Chaucer’s text. By emphasising the fragmentation of reality, he avoids making any moral judg-ments. The musical intermediary code in “The Reeve’s Tale” proves to be one of the most important tools for revealing this antinomy in the world. The song lyrics are usually opposed to the plot. The multilingualismof the songs hinders the audi-ence’s understanding of the text in its relation to the plot. Aware of it, Pasolini strives to achieve emotional engagement with the plot through the expressiveness of the music and the effect of breaking the ‘fourth wall’.
About the Author
A. A. Zhitenev
Voronezh State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander A. Zhitenev
Dr. Sci. (Philology), associate professor, professor of the Department of Publishing, Voronezh State University.
1, University square, Voronezh, 394018
AuthorID: 322109
References
1. Ackroyd, P. Kenterberijskie rasskazy. Perelozhenie pojemy Dzheffri Chosera [The Canterbury Tales. A retelling by Peter Ackroyd], transl. by T. Azarkovich. Moscow, Corpus Publ., 2014. 608 p. (In Russ.)
2. Boccaccio, D. Dekameron [The Decameron], transl. by A.N. Veselovsky. Moscow, GIHL Publ., 1955. 656 p. (In Russ.)
3. Gorbunov, A.N. “Chelovecheskaja komedija” Dzheffri Chosera [The Human Comedy by Geoffry Chaucer]. Chaucer, G. Kenterberijskie rasskazy [The Canterbury Tales]. Moscow, Nauka, 2012. pp. 579‒734. (In Russ.)
4. Krakauer, Z. Priroda Fil’ma. Reabilitatsiya fizicheskoy real’nosti [The Nature of Film: The Rehabilitation of Physical Reality]. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ., 1974. 424 p. (In Russ.)
5. Marievskaja, N.E. Jekranizacija literaturnogo proizvedenija: analiz hudozhestvennogo vremeni [Screen adaptation of a literary work: analysis of artistic time]. Moscow, VGIK Publ., 2016. 95 p. (In Russ.)
6. Medeleva, I.N. Svoeobrazie narrativnoj pojetiki Dzheffri Chosera [The originality of Geoffrey Chaucer’s narrative poetics]: Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Phi-lology). Moscow, 2005. 16 p. (In Russ.).
7. Pasolini, P.P. Teorema: scenarii, roman, povest', rasskazy, stat'i, jesse, interv'ju [Theorem: scenarios, novel, story, short stories, articles, essays, inter-views]. Moscow, Ladomir Publ., 2000. 737 p. (In Russ.)
8. Poljakova, S.V. Iz istorii srednevekovoj latinskoj novelly XIII v. [From the history of medieval Latin novella of the 13th century]. Rimskie dejanija [Gesta romanorum]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1980. P. 341‒369. (In Russ.)
9. Saraskina, L.I. Literaturnaja klassika v soblazne jekranizacij. Stoletie perevoploshhenij [Literary classics in the temptation of film adaptations. A century of reincarnations]. Moscow, Progress-Tradicija, 2018. 584 p.
10. Tolkien, R.R. Choser kak filolog i drugie stat'I [Chaucer as a Philologist and other articles]. Moscow, Elsewhere Publ., 2010. 592 p. (In Russ.)
11. Fedorova, L. Adaptacija kak simptom: russkaja klassika na postsovetskom jekrane [Adaptation as a Symptom: Russian Classics on the Post-Soviet Screen]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2022. 368 p. (In Russ.)
12. Foortai, F. P'er Paolo Pazolini i ego mif: “Trilogija zhizni” polveka spustja [“Pier Paolo Pasolini and His Myth: 'The Trilogy of Life' Half a Century Later”], Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Arts, vol. 12. no. 1, 2002, pp. 50–68. (In Russ.)
13. Chaucer, G. Kenterberijskie rasskazy [The Canterbury Tales]. Moscow, Nauka, 2012. 961 p. (In Russ.)
14. Shklovskij, V. O teorii prozy [On the Theory of Prose]. Moscow, Federacija, 1929. 265 p. (In Russ.)
15. Shtul'berg, A.M. Kul'turologicheskaja specifika anglijskogo gumanizma: sravnitel'naja harakteristika “Kenterberijskih rasskazov” Dzheffri Chosera i “Dekamerona” Dzhovanni Bokkachcho [Cultural specificity of English hu-manism: comparative characteristics of “The Canterbury Tales” by Geoffrey Chaucer and “The Decameron” by Giovanni Boccaccio]. Abstract of Cand. Dis. in Cultural Studies. Moscow, 2008. 26 p. (In Russ.)
16. Boccia, V. Metamorfosi de I Racconti di Canterbury, da Chaucer a Pasolini. Dottorato di ricerca in Studi letterari, linguistici e comparati. Napoli, 2020. 329 p. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/44695690/Metamorfosi_de_I_Racconti_di_Canterbury_da_Chaucer_a_Pasolini (Accessed: 28 August 2025).
17. Buljančević, R. Music in Pasolini’s “The Decameron”: Humour, Spirituality, (De)tabooisation and Playing with Conventional Signifiers of the Italian Musical Past. Zbornik radova Akademije umetnosti. 2022. Available at: https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2334-8666/2022/2334-86662210130B.pdf DOI 10.5937/ZbAkU2210130B (Accessed 28 August 2025).
18. Chaucer, G. The Canterbury Tales. The Reeve's Prologue and Tale. Har-vard's Geoffrey Chaucer Website. Available at: https://chaucer.fas.harvard.edu/pages/reeves-prologue-and-tale (Accessed 28 August 2025).
Review
For citations:
Zhitenev A.A. Features of the Reception of G. Chaucer in P.P. Pasolini’s “The Canterbury Tales” (“The Reeve’s Tale”). Vestnik VGIK. 2025;17(4(66)):67-79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.69975/2074-0832-2025-66-4-67-79
Views:
13
Email this article 