Preview

Vestnik VGIK

Advanced search

Modern Art History As a Human Science in a Situation of Cultural Turn

Abstract

Intensive development of knowledge in the 20th century,
including the emergence of new sciences and humanities, constantly creates a
problematic situation in the sphere of art, shifting art’s designation to what in
the philosophy of science is known as “normal science”. This is associated with
the idea of art as a science that has reached a stage of maturity and consistency
and, therefore, complies with its norms. The concept of art as “normal science”
is characterized by a certain degree of conservatism, as it presupposes art’s self-
protection against deviations from the established methodology.
However, sometimes the artistic processes of modernity require different
approaches. In addition, the emergence of new humanities shifts the already
established methodology of art. This happened in the first decades of the
20th century, in the era of a linguistic turn in the humanities, indicating the
invasion of natural sciences in the humanities; and this is happening today, at
the turn of the 21st century, in a situation of a cultural turn, the emergence
and intensive development of the science of culture. The current turn requires
a deeper understanding of the structure and components of art history, i.e., its
sub-disciplines: art history, art theory and art criticism.
The essay argues that in the situation of cultural turn the theory of art can
carry out functions which the other two sub-disciplines cannot. It propounds
that art theory is able to make a decisive contribution to the elucidation of two
problems: the relationship between art and cultural studies and the problem
of historical time, which is important both for contemporary art and for art
history.

About the Author

Nikolai A. Khrenov

Russian Federation


References

1. Asoyan Yu., Malafeyev A. Otkrytiye idei kultury (Opyt russkoy kulturologii serediny XIX–

2. nachala XX vekov) [Discovery of the idea of culture (The experience of Russian cultural

3. studies of the mid–19th–early 20th centuries)]. Moscow: OGI, 2000.

4. Bazen Zh. (1995) Istoriya istorii iskusstva. Ot Vazari do nashikh dney [History of Art History.

5. From Vasari to our days]. Moscow: Progress-Kultura, 1995. (In Russ.).

6. Gabrichevsky A. (2002) Morfologiya iskusstva [Art morphology]. Moscow: Agraf, 2002.

7. (In Russ.).

8. Zedlmayr Kh. Iskusstvo i istina. O teorii i metode istorii iskusstva [Art and truth. On the

9. theory and method of art history ]. Moscow, 1999.

10. Kristeva Yu. Izbrannye trudy: Razrusheniye poetiki [Selected Works: The Destruction of

11. Poetics]. Moscow: Rosspen, 2004.

12. Lazarev V. (1978) O metodologii sovremennogo iskusstvoznaniya [On the Methodology of

13. Contemporary Art History]. Sovetskoye iskusstvoznaniye. Vyp. 2. Moscow, 1978,

14. pp. 311–316. (In Russ.).

15. Lotman Yu. Problema ‘‘obucheniya kulture’’ kak eye tipologicheskaya kharakteristika

16. [The problem of “learning culture” as its typological characteristic]. Trudy po znakovym

17. sistemam. Tartu. Vypusk 5, 1971.

18. Lotman Yu. Semiotika kino i problemy kinoestetiki [Semiotics of cinema and problems of

19. film aesthetics]. Tallin, 1973. 173 p.

20. Panofsky E. Idea. K istorii ponyatiya v teorii iskusstva ot antichnosti do klassitsizma

21. [Idea. On the history of concepts in the theory of art from antiquity to classicism].

22. Moscow, 2002.

23. Yampolsky M. Yazyk — telo — sluchay. Kinematograf i poiski smysla [Language — Telo —

24. case: Cinema and the search for meaning]. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye, 2004.

25. p.


Review

For citations:


Khrenov N.A. Modern Art History As a Human Science in a Situation of Cultural Turn. Vestnik VGIK. 2019;11(2(40)):102-115. (In Russ.)

Views: 5


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2074-0832 (Print)
ISSN 2713-2471 (Online)