<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">vgik</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник ВГИК</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Vestnik VGIK</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2074-0832</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2713-2471</issn><publisher><publisher-name>ВГИК</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">vgik-816</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ТЕОРИЯ И ИСТОРИЯ КИНО ЭКРАННЫЕ ИСКУССТВА</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>FILM THEORY AND FILM HISTORY AUDIOVISUAL ARTS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Продукт киноиндустрии - культурное благо в форме товара</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The Product of Film Industry - a Cultural Good in Commodity Form</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Жабский</surname><given-names>Михаил Иванович</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Zhabsky</surname><given-names>Mikhail I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">m.zhabsky@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff xml:lang="ru" id="aff-1"><institution>Всероссийский государственный институт кинематографии им. С.А. Герасимова</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2018</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>04</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>2(36)</issue><fpage>27</fpage><lpage>36</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Жабский М.И., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Жабский М.И.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Zhabsky M.I.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vestnik-vgik.com/jour/article/view/816">https://www.vestnik-vgik.com/jour/article/view/816</self-uri><abstract><p>Рассматриваются сущностные особенности кинофильма как продукта киноиндустрии. В центре внимания - противоречие между духовно-культурной потребительной стоимостью продуктов киноиндустрии и товарной формой их производства и потребления. Затрагиваются связанные с этим проблемы самовыражения и воспроизводства культурной идентичности нации средствами кино, защиты культурного разнообразия.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In consideration are the essence characteristics of a theatrical feature as a product of film industry. The focus of attention is a contradiction between the psychic-cultural use value of film-industry products and the commodity form of their production and consumption. As the object of spectatorship needs, the product of film industry distinguishes itself in the capacity of a story narrated in the language of cinema, interestingly to the targeted movie-goer. Spectatorship needs are emotional, intellectual and other psychic impetuses of the individual, requiring satisfaction through one’s immersion in the image world of cinema. A difference is drawn between the spectators’ needs toward cinema and those of society as a whole. The film production aimed at a profitable satisfaction of individual needs is incapable of explicating and meeting certain societal needs. Psychological mechanisms of immersing spectators in a film world are the processes of empathy and identification, regression and projection, imparting cinema with some sort of magic. The modern film industry has grown on the soil of commodity film production to which some essential demerits are endemic. Picture of the world created by it is a function of the film’s commodity form, thus rendering the picture mongrel in many respects. The magnitude of the box office, functioning as a code for establishing and maintaining interaction between the society’s cultural “highs” and “lows”, entails certain dysfunctional consequences. In the modern conditions of globalization the national commodity-film production is forced to adapt to the demands of Americanized mass audience. With the irreversibility of an objective law, there crops up a certain loss of the national production’s own face. In this regard, consideration is given to the issues of authentically expressing and reproducing the nation’s identity by the means of cinema.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>киноиндустрия</kwd><kwd>кинофильм</kwd><kwd>товар</kwd><kwd>потребительная стоимость</kwd><kwd>общество</kwd><kwd>культура</kwd><kwd>коллективные грёзы</kwd><kwd>коллективная идентичность</kwd><kwd>культурное разнообразие</kwd><kwd>социальное действие</kwd><kwd>film industry</kwd><kwd>theatrical film</kwd><kwd>commodity</kwd><kwd>use value</kwd><kwd>society</kwd><kwd>culture</kwd><kwd>collective dreams</kwd><kwd>identity</kwd><kwd>cultural diversity</kwd><kwd>social action</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Конвенция об охране и поощрении разнообразия форм культурного самовыражения // URL.: http://www.ifapcom.ru/files/Konventsiya_ob_ohrane_i_pooschrenii_raznoobraziya_ form_kul_turnogo_samovyrazheniya.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Конвенция об охране и поощрении разнообразия форм культурного самовыражения // URL.: http://www.ifapcom.ru/files/Konventsiya_ob_ohrane_i_pooschrenii_raznoobraziya_ form_kul_turnogo_samovyrazheniya.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Жабский М.И. Социокультурная драма кинематографа. Аналитическая летопись (1969-2005). - М., 2009. - 774 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Жабский М.И. Социокультурная драма кинематографа. Аналитическая летопись (1969-2005). - М., 2009. - 774 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Маркс К. Капитал. Критика политической экономии. Т. I. Кн. 1. Процесс производства капитала. - М.: Политиздат, 1983. - 905 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Маркс К. Капитал. Критика политической экономии. Т. I. Кн. 1. Процесс производства капитала. - М.: Политиздат, 1983. - 905 c.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Тарасов К.А. Насилие в фильмах: три условия миметического воздействия // Вестник ВГИК, 2016, № 2 (28). - С. 84-96.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Тарасов К.А. Насилие в фильмах: три условия миметического воздействия // Вестник ВГИК, 2016, № 2 (28). - С. 84-96.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Тарасов К.А. Насилие в кино: латентное воздействие // ПОИСК: Политика. Обществоведение. Искусство. Социология. Культура, 2017. № 1 (60). - С. 107-118.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Тарасов К.А. Насилие в кино: латентное воздействие // ПОИСК: Политика. Обществоведение. Искусство. Социология. Культура, 2017. № 1 (60). - С. 107-118.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bächlin P. Film als Ware / Materialien zur Theorie des Films. Aesthetik, Soziologie, Politik. - München. 1971. - S. 146-157.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bächlin P. Film als Ware / Materialien zur Theorie des Films. Aesthetik, Soziologie, Politik. - München. 1971. - S. 146-157.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Baron R.A., Byrne D. Social Psychology: Understanding Human Interaction. 5th Edition. - Toronto: Allyn and Bacon, Inc., 1987. - 630 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Baron R.A., Byrne D. Social Psychology: Understanding Human Interaction. 5th Edition. - Toronto: Allyn and Bacon, Inc., 1987. - 630 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mirror neuron. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia // URL.: https://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Mirror_neuron (дата обращения: 27.01.2018)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mirror neuron. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia // URL.: https://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Mirror_neuron (дата обращения: 27.01.2018)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
