<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">vgik</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник ВГИК</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Vestnik VGIK</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2074-0832</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2713-2471</issn><publisher><publisher-name>ВГИК</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="edn" pub-id-type="custom">yxgnof</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">vgik-73</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>КУЛЬТУРА ЭКРАНА</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>SCREEN CULTURE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Возможна ли философия кино, и какие аспекты могут стать ее предметом?</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Is Film Philosophy Possible and What Aspects of Cinema May Become its Subject?</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Хренов</surname><given-names>Н. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Khrenov</surname><given-names>N. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор философских наук, профессор</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Doctor of Science in Philosophy, professor, head of the Section of the Artistic Problems in Media, Department of Media and Popular Arts</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Хренов</surname><given-names>А. Н.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Khrenov</surname><given-names>A. N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат культурологии</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD in Cultural Studies, leading researcher, Research Section</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff xml:lang="en" id="aff-1"><institution>State Research Institute for Art Studies</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en" id="aff-2"><institution>Academy of Media Industry</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>25</day><month>03</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>1(51)</issue><fpage>58</fpage><lpage>74</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Хренов Н.А., Хренов А.Н., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Хренов Н.А., Хренов А.Н.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Khrenov N.A., Khrenov A.N.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vestnik-vgik.com/jour/article/view/73">https://www.vestnik-vgik.com/jour/article/view/73</self-uri><abstract><p>В заключительной части статьи (начало: Том 13, № 2 (48); № 3 (49); № 4 (50) 2021) внимание уделяется заметному повороту в истории кино в сторону повышения значимости телесного начала. Это прослеживается и в стихийной практике кинорежиссуры, и в попытках отрефлексировать этот поворот в теории кино. Кинематограф трудно представить вне телесного начала, о чем свидетельствует уже ранняя эпоха в его истории. Однако радикализм модерна с присущими ему политическими и идеологическими установками препятствовал выходу телесности на экран в первой половине XX столетия. Иное дело — последующая эпоха и в особенности рубеж ХХ–ХХI веков. Активное вторжение телесности в экранную культуру рассматривается как значимая проблематика кинематографического опыта, о котором и шла речь в предыдущих частях статьи.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The use of a complex methodology in cinema studies is constantly being discussed. There are researches on sociology, psychology, aesthetics and semiotics of cinema. The movement towards an integrated methodology makes the idea of a philosophy of cinema relevant. The synthesis of different academic approaches in cinema studies can be only understood in terms of philosophy.Each discipline sees and is able to explain through cinema merely what is connected with its agenda. An appropriate methodology needs to be developed so that these different aspects of cinema are transformed into the elements of a uniform system. The article analyzes the philosophical approach to cinema studies of Gilles Deleuze, who made cinema instrumental in examining time.Deleuze’s work in question explores Henri Bergson's argumentation of dramatic changes in the perception of time. It would seem that it was cinema, with its ability to capture the dynamism of social life, that should have demonstrated the meaning of such changes. Bergson understood, quite traditionally, the ability of cinema to recreate time in the forms of space. Deleuze shares the conventional point of view on the fate of philosophy, which argues that previous philosophy disappears and, dissolving in art, exists only in artistic manifestations. The authors conclude that:1. The intrusion of philosophy into cinema dictates the need to develop a theory as a mediator between film philosophy and filmmaking.2. When studying cinema through other liberal sciences, it is necessary to avoid discussing specific aspects and strive for a systematic consideration.3. The study of cinema from the point of view of various schools of thought, does not exclude finding points of contact between them.4. The need for an integrated methodology in studying cinema involving philosophical angles is also dictated by the rapid development of technology. It is necessary to take into account what has already been accomplished in the philosophy of technology.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>философия кино</kwd><kwd>кинематографический опыт</kwd><kwd>телесность</kwd><kwd>тактильное кино</kwd><kwd>чувственность</kwd><kwd>компенсаторная функция</kwd><kwd>феноменология</kwd><kwd>Ж. Делёз</kwd><kwd>гаптическая система видения</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>philosophy of cinema</kwd><kwd>Deleuze</kwd><kwd>Bergson</kwd><kwd>life philosophy</kwd><kwd>existentialism</kwd><kwd>postmodernism</kwd><kwd>time</kwd><kwd>auteur cinema</kwd><kwd>cinematic experience</kwd><kwd>corporeality</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гайденко П. Трагедия эстетизма. Опыт характеристики миросозерцания Серена Киркегора. М.: Искусство. 1970. 198 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gaidenko P. (1970). Tragedia estetisma. Opyt harakteristiki mirosozertsaniya Serena Kirkegora [Tragedy of Aesthetism. The attempt of a definition of Soren Kirkegaard’s worldview]. Moskva: Iskusstvo. 1970. 246 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Джеймисон Ф. Постмодернизм или культурная логика позднего капитализма. М.: Издательство Института Гайдара, 2019. 427c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jameson F. (2019). Postmodernism, ili kulturnya logika pozdnego kapitalizma [Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Instituta Gaidara. 2019. 427 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Делёз Ж. Кино. М.: Ад Маргинем Пресс. 2016. 560 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Delez Zh. (2016). Kino [Cinema]. Moskva.: Ad Marginem Press, 2016. 289 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Зедльмайр Х. Утрата середины. М.: Прогресс-Традиция. Издательский дом «Территория будущего», 2008. 640 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">ZedlmayrKh. (2008). Utrataserediny [The loss of the middle.]. Moskva: Progress-Tradirsiya. Izdatesky Dom “Territoriyabuduschego”. 2008. 640 р. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кракауэр З. Природа фильма. Реабилитация физической реальности. М.: Искусство, 1974. 424 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kracauer, Z. (1974) Prirodafilma. Reabilitatsiafizicheskoirealnosty [Theory of Film: The Redemption of Physical Reality]. Moskva: Iskusstvo.1974. 424 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Пазолини П. Поэтическое кино // Строение фильма. М.: Радуга. 1985. 280 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pazolini P-P. (1985). Poeticheskoye kino [Poetic cinema] // Stroyeniye filma. M.: Raduga, 1985. 280 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хренов Н. Новая визуальность как проблема культуры. М.: Санкт-Петербург: Центр гуманитарных инициатив. 2019. 416 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khrenov N. (2019). Novaya vizualnost kak problema kultury [New visuality as the problem of culture]. Moskva — Sankt-Petersburg: Tsentr Gumanitarnyh Initsiativ. 2019. 416 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хренов Н. Посттоталитарный период в истории российского кино: религиозная традиция и массовая ментальность//Артикульт. Научный электронный журнал Факультета истории искусства Российского государственного гуманитарного университета, 2017. № 1 (25). С. 6–17.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khrenov N. (2017). Post-totalitarniy period v istoriirossiiskogokino: religioznayatraditsiyaima ssovayamentalnost’ [Post-totalitarian period in the history of Russian cinema] // Scientific electronic journal of the Art History Department, Russian State University for the Humanities “Articult“.2017. Issue 1 (25). 6–17 p</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хренов Н. Дискурс А. Тарковского с культурологической точки зрения: русский мессианизм без имперского комплекса // Научный журнал «Ярославский педагогический вестник». 2018., № 2. С. 159–178.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khrenov N. (2018). Discurs A. Tarkovskogo s kulturologicheskoi tochki zreniya: russki messianism bes imperskogo kompleksa [The discourse of A. Tarkovsky from the cultural studies angle: Russian messianism with an imperial complex] // “Yaroslavsky pedagogichesky vestnik” journal. 2018., № 2. Pp. 169–178. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шпигельберг Г. Феноменологическое движение. Историческое введение. М.: Логос, 2002. 680 с</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shpigelberg G. (2002). Fenomenologicheskoye dvizhenie. Istoricheskoe vvedenie. [Phenomenological movement. Historical introduction]. Moskva: Logos. 2002. 680p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Эльзессер Т., Хагенер М. Теория кино: глаз, эмоции, тело. СПб.: Сеанс. 2016. 440 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Elsaesser T., Hagener M. (2016). Teoriya kino: glaz, emotsii, telo [Film Theory: An Introduction through the Senses]. Sankt-Petersburg: Seans. 2016. 440 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Эпштейн М. Постмодерн в России. Литература и теория. М.: Издание Р. Элинина. 2000. 368 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Epstein M. Postmodern v Rossii. Literatura i teoriya [Postmodern in Russia. Literature and theory]. Moskva: Izdanie P. Elinina. 2000. 368 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
