<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">vgik</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник ВГИК</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Vestnik VGIK</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2074-0832</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2713-2471</issn><publisher><publisher-name>ВГИК</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">vgik-483</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ТЕЛЕВИДЕНИЕ | ЦИФРОВАЯ СРЕДА</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>TELEVISION | DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Социокультурные эффекты фрагментации аудитории</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Social and cultural effects of the fragmentation of the audience</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Бакулев</surname><given-names>Геннадий Петрович</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Bakulev</surname><given-names>Gennady Petrovich</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ВГИК</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>VGIK</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2013</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>04</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>5</volume><issue>3(17)</issue><fpage>137</fpage><lpage>146</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Бакулев Г.П., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Бакулев Г.П.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Bakulev G.P.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vestnik-vgik.com/jour/article/view/483">https://www.vestnik-vgik.com/jour/article/view/483</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье рассматривается проблема фрагментации аудитории мультимедийной среды. На первом этапе медиабума казалось, что аудитория в привычном понятии этого термина умирает. Но последние данные свидетельствуют о том, что, распределяясь по множеству каналов, медиапользователи постоянно мигрируют между ними. Рассматриваемые два основных подхода к изучению фрагментации аудитории — медиа-центрический и пользователь-центрический — подтверждают, что аудитория находится в состоянии «плавающей фрагментации».</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article deals with the problem of multimedia audience fragmentation. In the first period of the media boom the audience in the usual meaning of this term seemed to be shrinking dramatically. But recent findings show that media users keep migrating between lots of channels. The two main ways to study the audience fragmentation explored by the author — the media-centrical and the user-centrical ones — confirm that the audience is in a state of “floating fragmentation”.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>массовая коммуникация</kwd><kwd>аудитория</kwd><kwd>социокультурные эффекты</kwd><kwd>фрагментация аудитории</kwd><kwd>медиа- центрический подход</kwd><kwd>пользователь- центрический подход</kwd><kwd>медиапользователи</kwd><kwd>медиапровайдеры</kwd><kwd>плавающая фрагментация</kwd><kwd>mass communication</kwd><kwd>audience</kwd><kwd>sociocultural effects</kwd><kwd>audience fragmentation</kwd><kwd>media-centrical approach</kwd><kwd>user-centrical approach</kwd><kwd>media users</kwd><kwd>media providers</kwd><kwd>floating fragmentation</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Барт Р. Избранные работы: Семиотика. Поэтика. — М., 1994. — С. 384-391.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Барт Р. Избранные работы: Семиотика. Поэтика. — М., 1994. — С. 384-391.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rosen Jay (June 27, 2006). "The People Formerly Known as the Audience". PressThink.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rosen Jay (June 27, 2006). "The People Formerly Known as the Audience". PressThink.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Katz E. (1996). And deliver us from segmentation. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546, 22.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Katz E. (1996). And deliver us from segmentation. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546, 22.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Webster J. G. &amp; Ksiazek, T. B. (2012). The Dynamics of Audience Fragmentation: Public Attention in an Age of Digital Media. Journal of Communication, v. 62(1), 39-56.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Webster J. G. &amp; Ksiazek, T. B. (2012). The Dynamics of Audience Fragmentation: Public Attention in an Age of Digital Media. Journal of Communication, v. 62(1), 39-56.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гидденс Э. Устроение общества: Очерк теории структурации. М.: Академический проект, 2005.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Гидденс Э. Устроение общества: Очерк теории структурации. М.: Академический проект, 2005.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Webster J.G. (2005). Beneath the veneer of fragmentation: Television audience polarization in a multichannel world. Journal of Communication, 55(2), 366-382.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Webster J.G. (2005). Beneath the veneer of fragmentation: Television audience polarization in a multichannel world. Journal of Communication, 55(2), 366-382.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tewksbury D. (2005). The seeds of audience fragmentation: Specialization in the use of onlinenews sites. Journal of Broadcasting &amp; Electronic Media, 49. 332-348.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tewksbury D. (2005). The seeds of audience fragmentation: Specialization in the use of onlinenews sites. Journal of Broadcasting &amp; Electronic Media, 49. 332-348.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">van Rees K., &amp; van Eijck K. (2003). Media repertoires of selective audiences: The impact of status, gender, and age on media use. Poetics, 31, 465-490.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">van Rees K., &amp; van Eijck K. (2003). Media repertoires of selective audiences: The impact of status, gender, and age on media use. Poetics, 31, 465-490.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Полуэхтова И.А. Динамика российской аудитории. [Электронный ресурс URL: www.acvi.ru/ Portals/0/docs/Полу-эхтова%20_И.А. pdf [дата обращения 28/08/2013].</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Полуэхтова И.А. Динамика российской аудитории. [Электронный ресурс URL: www.acvi.ru/ Portals/0/docs/Полу-эхтова%20_И.А. pdf [дата обращения 28/08/2013].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Turow J. (1997). Breaking up America: Advertisers and the new media world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Turow J. (1997). Breaking up America: Advertisers and the new media world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sunstein C.R. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sunstein C.R. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gitlin T. (1998). Public sphere or public sphericules? In T. Liebes &amp; J. Curran (Eds.), Media, ritual and identity (pp. 168-174). London: Routledge.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gitlin T. (1998). Public sphere or public sphericules? In T. Liebes &amp; J. Curran (Eds.), Media, ritual and identity (pp. 168-174). London: Routledge.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Garrett R.K. (2009). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59(4), 676-699.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Garrett R.K. (2009). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59(4), 676-699.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Elberse A. (2008). Should you invest in the long tail? Harvard Business Review, 86 (7/8), 88-96.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Elberse A. (2008). Should you invest in the long tail? Harvard Business Review, 86 (7/8), 88-96.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Boczkowski P.J. (2010). News at work: Imitation in an age of information abundance. Chicago: University of Chicago.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Boczkowski P.J. (2010). News at work: Imitation in an age of information abundance. Chicago: University of Chicago.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Барт Р. Избранные работы: Семиотика. Поэтика. — М., 1994 — С. 384-391.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Барт Р. Избранные работы: Семиотика. Поэтика. — М., 1994 — С. 384-391.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Полуэхтова И.А. Динамика российской аудитории. [Электронный ресурс URL: www.acvi. ru/Portals/0/docs/Полуэхтова%20_И.А.pdf [Дата обращения 28/08/2013].</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Полуэхтова И.А. Динамика российской аудитории. [Электронный ресурс URL: www.acvi. ru/Portals/0/docs/Полуэхтова%20_И.А.pdf [Дата обращения 28/08/2013].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Anderson C. (2006). The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. New York: Hyperion.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Anderson C. (2006). The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. New York: Hyperion.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Boczkowski P.J. (2010). News at work: Imitation in an age of information abundance. Chicago: University of Chicago.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Boczkowski P.J. (2010). News at work: Imitation in an age of information abundance. Chicago: University of Chicago.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Caves R.E. (2000). Creative industries: Contracts between art and commerce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Caves R.E. (2000). Creative industries: Contracts between art and commerce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Elberse A. (2008). Should you invest in the long tail? Harvard Business Review, 86 (7/8), 88-96.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Elberse A. (2008). Should you invest in the long tail? Harvard Business Review, 86 (7/8), 88-96.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Garrett R.K. (2009). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59(4), 676-699.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Garrett R.K. (2009). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59(4), 676-699.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gitlin T. (1998). Public sphere or public sphericules? In T. Liebes &amp; J. Curran (Eds.), Media, ritual and identity (pp. 168-174). London: Routledge.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gitlin T. (1998). Public sphere or public sphericules? In T. Liebes &amp; J. Curran (Eds.), Media, ritual and identity (pp. 168-174). London: Routledge.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Katz E. (1996). And deliver us from segmentation. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546, 22-33.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Katz E. (1996). And deliver us from segmentation. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546, 22-33.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Katz E., &amp; Lazarsfeld P.F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Katz E., &amp; Lazarsfeld P.F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ksiazek T.B. (2010). Cross-platform audience behavior in an abundant media environment: An integrated approach to understanding fragmentation, polarization, and media publics through network analysis (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest (UMI No. 10524).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ksiazek T.B. (2010). Cross-platform audience behavior in an abundant media environment: An integrated approach to understanding fragmentation, polarization, and media publics through network analysis (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest (UMI No. 10524).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nielsen Wire. (2010, February 12). 14% Multi-tasked and got social on the Web during Super Bowl. The Nielsen Company. ttp://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/14 — multi-tasked-and-got-social-on-the-web-during-super-bowl/ NielsenWire. (2010, February 19). Viewers go surfing during Winter Olympic Opening Ceremonies. The Nielsen Company http://blog.nielsen. com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/viewers-go-surfing-during-winterolympic-opening-ceremonies/ print/</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nielsen Wire. (2010, February 12). 14% Multi-tasked and got social on the Web during Super Bowl. The Nielsen Company. ttp://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/14 — multi-tasked-and-got-social-on-the-web-during-super-bowl/ NielsenWire. (2010, February 19). Viewers go surfing during Winter Olympic Opening Ceremonies. The Nielsen Company http://blog.nielsen. com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/viewers-go-surfing-during-winterolympic-opening-ceremonies/ print/</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Owen B.M., &amp; Wildman S.S. (1992). Video economics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Owen B.M., &amp; Wildman S.S. (1992). Video economics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sunstein C.R. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sunstein C.R. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tewksbury D. (2005). The seeds of audience fragmentation: Specialization in the use of online news sites. Journal of Broadcasting &amp; Electronic Media, 49. 332-348.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tewksbury D. (2005). The seeds of audience fragmentation: Specialization in the use of online news sites. Journal of Broadcasting &amp; Electronic Media, 49. 332-348.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Turow J. (1997). Breaking up America: Advertisers and the new media world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Turow J. (1997). Breaking up America: Advertisers and the new media world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">van Rees K., &amp; van Eijck K. (2003). Media repertoires of selective audiences: The impact of status, gender, and age on media use. Poetics, 31, 465-490.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">van Rees K., &amp; van Eijck K. (2003). Media repertoires of selective audiences: The impact of status, gender, and age on media use. Poetics, 31, 465-490.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Webster J.G. (2005). Beneath the veneer of fragmentation: Television audience polarization in a multichannel world. Journal of Communication, 55(2), 366-382.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Webster J.G. (2005). Beneath the veneer of fragmentation: Television audience polarization in a multichannel world. Journal of Communication, 55(2), 366-382.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Webster J.G. &amp; Ksiazek T.B. (2012). The Dynamics of Audience Fragmentation: Public Attention in an Age of Digital Media. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 39-56.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Webster J.G. &amp; Ksiazek T.B. (2012). The Dynamics of Audience Fragmentation: Public Attention in an Age of Digital Media. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 39-56.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
