<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">vgik</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник ВГИК</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Vestnik VGIK</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2074-0832</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2713-2471</issn><publisher><publisher-name>ВГИК</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17816/VGIK88714</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">vgik-46</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>КУЛЬТУРА ЭКРАНА</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>SCREEN CULTURE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Возможна ли философия кино, и какие аспекты могут стать ее предметом?</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Is Film Philosophy Possible and What Aspects of Cinema May Become its Subject?</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Хренов</surname><given-names>Н. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Khrenov</surname><given-names>N. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор философских наук, профессор</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Doctor of Science in Philosophy, professor, head of the Section of the Artistic Problems in Media, Department of Media and Popular Arts</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Хренов</surname><given-names>А. Н.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Khrenov</surname><given-names>A. N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат культурологии</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD in Cultural Studies, leading researcher, Research Section</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff xml:lang="en" id="aff-1"><institution>State Research Institute for Art Studies</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en" id="aff-2"><institution>Academy of Media Industry</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>24</day><month>03</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>3(49)</issue><fpage>96</fpage><lpage>114</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Хренов Н.А., Хренов А.Н., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Хренов Н.А., Хренов А.Н.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Khrenov N.A., Khrenov A.N.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vestnik-vgik.com/jour/article/view/46">https://www.vestnik-vgik.com/jour/article/view/46</self-uri><abstract><p>Вторая часть статьи (начало — в № 2 (48), 2021 журнала) — продолжение обсуждаемого вопроса о кино как средства выражения нового понимания времени, которое с некоторых пор более не может быть измерено с помощью пространства, как это имело место в предшествующей истории философии и искусства. В связи с этим уточнены суждения А. Бергсона о кино. В статье также продолжено воссоздание истории философской рефлексии, в частности, в теории кино, как и в предпринимаемых попытках воспользоваться при исследовании кино представлениями, существующими в других науках, и в том числе в философии.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The use of a complex methodology in cinema studies is constantly being discussed. There are researches on sociology, psychology, aesthetics and semiotics of cinema. The movement towards an integrated methodology makes the idea of a philosophy of cinema relevant. The synthesis of different academic approaches in cinema studies can be only understood in terms of philosophy. Each discipline sees and is able to explain through cinema merely what is connected with its agenda. An appropriate methodology needs to be developed so that these different aspects of cinema are transformed into the elements of a uniform system. The article analyzes the philosophical approach to cinema studies of Gilles Deleuze, who made cinema instrumental in examining time. Deleuze’s work in question explores Henri Bergson's argumentation of dramatic changes in the perception of time. It would seem that it was cinema, with its ability to capture the dynamism of social life, that should have demonstrated the meaning of such changes. Bergson understood, quite traditionally, the ability of cinema to recreate time in the forms of space. Deleuze shares the conventional point of view on the fate of philosophy, which argues that previous philosophy disappears and, dissolving in art, exists only in artistic manifestations. The authors conclude that:1. The intrusion of philosophy into cinema dictates the need to develop a theory as a mediator between film philosophy and filmmaking.2. When studying cinema through other liberal sciences, it is necessary to avoid discussing specific aspects and strive for a systematic consideration. 3. The study of cinema from the point of view of various schools of thought, does not exclude finding points of contact between them.4. The need for an integrated methodology in studying cinema involving philosophical angles is also dictated by the rapid development of technology. It is necessary to take into account what has already been accomplished in the philosophy of technology.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>философия кино</kwd><kwd>теория кино</kwd><kwd>время</kwd><kwd>пространство</kwd><kwd>А. Бергсон</kwd><kwd>Ж. Делёз</kwd><kwd>С. Эйзенштейн</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>philosophy of cinema</kwd><kwd>Deleuze</kwd><kwd>Bergson</kwd><kwd>life philosophy</kwd><kwd>existentialism</kwd><kwd>postmodernism</kwd><kwd>time</kwd><kwd>auteur cinema</kwd><kwd>cinematic experience</kwd><kwd>corporeality</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Балаш Б. Культура кино. Л.; М.: Государственное издательство, 1925. 98 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Balazs B. (1925) Kultura kino [The culture of film]. Leningrad-Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo, 1925. 98 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бордвелл Д. Поэтика кино // Киноведческие записки. 2012. №№100/101. С. 130–184.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bordwell D. (2012) Poetika kino [Poetics of cinema] // Kinovedcheskiye zapiski, 2012. Issues 100/101. pp. 130–184. 704 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вейцман Е. Очерки философии кино М.: Искусство. 1978. 232 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Veitsman E. (1978). Ocherki filosofii kino [Essays in film philosophy]. M: Iskusstvo. 1978. 232 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Делёз Ж.-М. Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2016. 289 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Deleuze J. (2016) Kino [Cinema]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press, 2016. 560 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Жабский М. Социология кино. М.: Канон-Плюс. 2020. 512 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhabsky M. (2020). Sotsiologiya kino [Sociology of cinema]. M.: Kanon-Plus. 2020. 512 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Иванов В. Эстетика Эйзенштейна // Избранные труды по семиотике и истории культуры. Т. 1. М.: Языки русской культуры, 1998. 912 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ivanov V.V. (1998) Estetika Eisensteina [Eisentsein’s aesthetics] // Izbrannye trudy po semiotike i istorii kultury. Vol. 1. Moscow: Yazyki russkoi kultury, 1998. 912 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кошут Дж. Искусство после философии // Искусствознание. 2001. № 1. С. 543–563.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kosuth J. Iskusstvo posle filosofii [Art after philosophy] // Iskusstvoznanie. 2001. Issue 1. pp. 543–563. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лотман Ю. Семиотика кино и проблемы киноэстетики. Таллин: Ээсти Раамат, 1973. 140 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lotman Yu. (1973) Semiotika kino i problemy kinoestetiki [The Semiotics of Cinema]. Tallinn: Eesti Raamat, 1973. 140 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Пазолини П. Поэтическое кино // Строение фильма. М.: Радуга. 1985. С. 45–280.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pazolini P-P. (1985). Poeticheskoye kino [Poetic cinema] // Stroyeniye filma. M.: Raduga, 1985. pp. 45–66. 280 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Поликарпова Д. Кинематографический опыт без зрителя: философия кино как философия кинематографической чувственности // Кинематографический опыт: история — теория — практика. Коллективная монография. СПб.: Издательство «Порядок слов», 2020. С. 203–227.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Polikarpova D. (2020). Kinematograficheskiy opyt bez zritelia: filosofia kino kak filosofia kinematograficheskoi chuvstvennosti [Cinematic experience without a spectator: The philosophy of cinema as the philosophy of cinematic sensuality] // Kinematograficheskiy opyt. Istoria-teoria-praktika. Saint-Petersburg: Izdatelstvo Poriadok Slov, 2020. pp. 203–227 360 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Поэтика кино (Под редакцией Б. Эйхенбаума). М-Л.: Кинопечать.1927. 192 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Poetika kino (Pod redaktsiei B. Eikhenbauma) [The Poetics of cinema. Edited by B. Eikhenbaum]. Moscow-Leningrad: Teakinopechat’, 1927. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Поэтика кино. Теоретические работы 1920-х годов. М.: Академический проект, 2016. 497 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Poetika kino. Teoreticheskie raboty 1920-h godov. [The Poetics of cinema. Theorethical works of the twenties]. Moscow: Akademicheski Proekt, 2016. 497 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Соколов В. Киноведение как наука М.: Канон+, 2010. 416 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sokolov V. (2010). Kinovedenie kak nauka [Cinema studies as science]. Moscow: Research Institute for Cinematography, 2010. p. (In Russ).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хренов Н. Проект семиотики кино спустя несколько десятилетий: интерпретация теоретического наследия С.М. Эйзенштейна Вяч. Вс. Ивановым // Культура и искусство. 2014. № 6. С. 634–652.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khrenov N. (2014). Proekt semiotiki kino spustia neskolko desiatiletiy: [The project of film semiotics after several decades: An interpretation of S. Eisenstein’s theoretical heritage by V.V. Ivanov] // Kultura i iskusstvo. 2014. Issue 6. pp. 162–378 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хренов Н. Современное искусствознание как гуманитарная наука в ситуации культурологического поворота // Вестник ВГИК. 2019. №№ 1–4. 2020, № 1–2.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khrenov N. (2019). Sovremennoe iskusstvoznanie kak gumanitarnaya nauka v situatsii kulturologicheskogo povorota [Contemporary art history as a humanitarian science in the situation of a cultural turn] // Vestnik VGIKa. 2019 (Issues 1–4), 2020 (Issues 1–2). (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Эйзенштейн С. Психология искусства (Неопубликованные конспекты статьи и курса лекций) // Психология процессов художественного творчества. Ответственные редакторы Б.С. Мейлах, Н.А. Хренов М.: Наука. 1980. С. 173–203.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Eisenstein S. (1980). Psihologia iskusstva (Neopublikovannye konspekty stat’i i kursa lektsiy) [The psychology of art (The unpublshed abstracts of the article and course of lectures)] // Psihologia protsessov khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva. Chief editors B.S. Meylakh, N.A. Khrenov. Moscow: Nauka, 1980. pp. 173–203. 286 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ямпольский М. Видимый человек. Очерки ранней кинофеноменологии. М. Научно-исследовательский институт киноискусства. Центральный музей кино. Международная киношкола. 1993. 216 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yampolsky M.B. Iz istorii frantsuzskoi kinomysli. Nemoye kino [From the history of the French film thought. Silent Cinema]. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1988. 216 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Khrenov N. Cinema аs the Redemption of Archtypal Reality // Narration and Spectatorship in Moving Images. Edited by J.D. Anderson and B.F. Anderson. Cambridge Scholars. Newcastle. 2007. Pp. 29–41.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khrenov N. (2007). Cinema аs the Redemption of Archtypal Reality // Narration and Spectatorship in Moving images. Edited by J. D. Anderson and B. F. Anderson. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars, 2007. Pp. 29–41.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
