<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">vgik</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник ВГИК</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Vestnik VGIK</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2074-0832</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2713-2471</issn><publisher><publisher-name>ВГИК</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17816/VGIK79515</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">vgik-31</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>КУЛЬТУРА ЭКРАНА</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>SCREEN CULTURE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Возможна ли философия кино и какие аспекты могут стать ее предметом?</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Is Film Philosophy Possible and What Aspects of Cinema May Become its Subject?</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Хренов</surname><given-names>Н. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Khrenov</surname><given-names>N. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор философских наук, профессор</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Doctor of Science in Philosophy, professor, head of the Section of the Artistic Problems in Media, Department of Media and Popular Arts</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Хренов</surname><given-names>А. Н.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Khrenov</surname><given-names>A. N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат культурологии</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD in Cultural Studies, leading researcher, Research Section</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff xml:lang="en" id="aff-1"><institution>State Research Institute for Art Studies</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en" id="aff-2"><institution>Academy of Media Industry</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>23</day><month>03</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>2(48)</issue><fpage>102</fpage><lpage>118</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Хренов Н.А., Хренов А.Н., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Хренов Н.А., Хренов А.Н.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Khrenov N.A., Khrenov A.N.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vestnik-vgik.com/jour/article/view/31">https://www.vestnik-vgik.com/jour/article/view/31</self-uri><abstract><p>Статья анализирует разработку научного направления «философия кино», необходимого в силу активизации философских подтекстов авторского кино и его связей с философией жизни, — экзистенциализмом, постмодернизмом и другими течениями. Философского исследования требуют три конкретные проблемы: первая — кинематографический опыт, вторая — время в кинематографе, третья — вопрос о телесности в кино в результате вторжения технологий в коммуникацию кино с массовой аудиторией.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The use of a complex methodology in cinema studies is constantly being discussed. There are researches on sociology, psychology, aesthetics and semiotics of cinema. The movement towards an integrated methodology makes the idea of a philosophy of cinema relevant. The synthesis of different academic approaches in cinema studies can be only understood in terms of philosophy. Each discipline sees and is able to explain through cinema merely what is connected with its agenda. An appropriate methodology needs to be developed so that these different aspects of cinema are transformed into the elements of a uniform system. The article analyzes the philosophical approach to cinema studies of Gilles Deleuze, who made cinema instrumental in examining time. Deleuze’s work in question explores Henri Bergson's argumentation of dramatic changes in the perception of time. It would seem that it was cinema, with its ability to capture the dynamism of social life, that should have demonstrated the meaning of such changes. Bergson understood, quite traditionally, the ability of cinema to recreate time in the forms of space. Deleuze shares the conventional point of view on the fate of philosophy, which argues that previous philosophy disappears and, dissolving in art, exists only in artistic manifestations. The authors conclude that:1. The intrusion of philosophy into cinema dictates the need to develop a theory as a mediator between film philosophy and filmmaking.2. When studying cinema through other liberal sciences, it is necessary to avoid discussing specific aspects and strive for a systematic consideration.3. The study of cinema from the point of view of various schools of thought, does not exclude finding points of contact between them.4. The need for an integrated methodology in studying cinema involving philosophical angles is also dictated by the rapid development of technology. It is necessary to take into account what has already been accomplished in the philosophy of technology.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>философия кино</kwd><kwd>Ж. Делёз</kwd><kwd>А. Бергсон</kwd><kwd>философия жизни</kwd><kwd>экзистенциализм</kwd><kwd>постмодернизм</kwd><kwd>время</kwd><kwd>авторское кино</kwd><kwd>кинематографический опыт</kwd><kwd>телесность</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>philosophy of cinema</kwd><kwd>Deleuze</kwd><kwd>Bergson</kwd><kwd>life philosophy</kwd><kwd>existentialism</kwd><kwd>postmodernism</kwd><kwd>time</kwd><kwd>auteur cinema</kwd><kwd>cinematic experience</kwd><kwd>corporeality</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Балаш Б. Культура кино. Л.; М.: Государственное издательство, 1925. 98 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Balazs B. (1925) Kultura kino [The culture of film]. Leningrad-Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo, 1925. 98 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гармс Р. Философия фильма. Л.: Academia, 1927. С. 192.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Harms R. (1927) Filosofia Filma [Philosophy of Film]. Leningrad: Academia, 1927. 192 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гайденко П. Время. Длительность. Вечность. Проблема времени в европейской философии и науке. М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2006. С. 464.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gaidenko P. (2006) Vremya. Dlitelnost. Vechnost. Problema vremeni v evropeiskoi filosofii i nauke. [Time. Duration. Eternity. The problem of time in European philosophy and science]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya, 2006. 464 р. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Делёз Ж.-М. Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2016. 560 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Deleuze J. (2016) Kino [Cinema]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press, 2016. 560 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Зедльмайр Х. Искусство и истина. О теории и методе истории искусства. М., 1999. 368 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sedlmayr H. (2000) Iskusstvo i istina. O teorii i metode istorii iskusstva [Art and truth. On theory and method of art history]. Saint-Petersburg: Axioma, 2000. 368 р. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Иванов В. Эстетика Эйзенштейна // Избранные труды по семиотике и истории культуры. Т. 1. М.: Языки русской культуры, 1998. 912 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ivanov V.V. (1998) Estetika Eisensteina [Eisentsein’s aesthetics] // Izbrannye trudy po semiotike i istorii kultury. Vol. 1. Moscow: Yazyki russkoi kultury, 1998. 912 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Из истории французской киномысли: Немое кино. 1911–1933 гг. М.: Искусство, 1988. 320 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Iz istorii frantsuzskoi kinomysli. Nemoye kino. [From the history of the French film thought. Silent Cinema]. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1988. 320 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кассирер Э. Жизнь и учение Канта. СПб.: Университетская книга, 1997. 448 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cassirer E. (1997) Zhizn i uchenie Kanta [Kant’s Life and Thought]. Saint-Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga, 1997. 448 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кинематографический опыт: история, теория, практика. Коллективная монография. СПб.: Порядок слов, 2020. 360 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kinematograficheskii opyt: istoriya, teoriya, praktika. Kollektivnaya monografiya [Film experience: history, theory, practice. The collective monograph]. Saint-Petersburg: Poriadok Slov, 2020. 360 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Левшина И. О предмете социологии искусства (К проблеме взаимоотношений социологии и искусствознания) // Вопросы социологии искусства. Теоретические и методологические проблемы. М., 1979. С. 33–57.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Levshina I. (1979) O predmete sotsiologii iskusstva. K probleme vzaimootnosheniy sotsiologii i iskusstvoznania [On a subject of art sociology. Towards the problem of relations between socilogy and art studies] // Voprosy sotsiologii iskusstva. Teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie problemy. Moscow, 1979. 33–57 pp. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Линцбах Я. Принципы философского языка: опыт точного языкознания. Пг: Новое Время, 1916. 228 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Linzbach J. (1916) Printsipy filosofskogo iazyka [The Principles of Philosophical Language: An Attempt at Exact Linguistics]. Petrograd: Novoye Vremya, 1916. 228 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лотман Ю. Семиотика кино и проблемы киноэстетики. Таллин: Ээсти Раамат, 1973. 140 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lotman Yu. (1973) Semiotika kino i problemy kinoestetiki [The Semiotics of Cinema]. Tallinn: Eesti Raamat, 1973. 140 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мерло-Понти М. Кино и новая психология //Киноведческие записки. 1992. № 16. С. 13–23.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Merleau-Ponty M. (1992) Kino i novaya psihologia [The Film and the New Psychology] // Kinovedcheskie zapiski. 1992. № 16. Pp. 13–23. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сидоров А. Телесность в кинематографическом опыте: случай Б. Балаша // Кинематографический опыт: история, теория, практика. Коллективная монография. СПб.: Порядок слов, 2020. С. 54–73.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sidorov A. (2020) Telesnost v kinematograficheskom opyte: sluchai B. Balasha [Physicality in cinematic experience: the case of B. Balash] //Kinematograficheskiy opyt: istoria, teoria, praktika. 2020. Pp. 54–73. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хренов Н. Виртуальная реальность в художественных и нехудожественных проявлениях: ее предыстория и история // Наука телевидения и экранных искусств. Научный альманах. Вып. 14. М., 2018. С. 27–52.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khrenov N. (2018) Virtualnaya realnost v hudozhestvennyh i nehudozhestvennyh proyavleniah: ee predystoria i istoria [Virtual reality in art and non-fiction: its pre-history and history] // Nauka televideniya i ekrannyh iskusstv. Nauchny almanakh. Issue 14. Moscow, 2018. Pp. 27–52. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Цивьян Ю. Историческая рецепция кино: Кинематограф в России. 1896–1930. Рига, 1991. 492 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tsivian Yu. (1991) Istoricheskaya retseptsia kino: Kinematograf v Rossii, 1896–1930 [Early cinema in Russia and its cultural reception]. Riga: Zinatne, 1991. 492 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шереметева А. Кино как предмет философии в ранних работах Ж.-П. Сартра // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 7. Философия. 2018. № 4. С. 83–97.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sheremeteva A. (2018) Kino kak predmet filosofii v rannih rabotah J.-P. Sartra [Cinema as a subject of philosophy in early works of J.-P. Sartre] // Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seria 7. Philosophy. 2018. № 4. (In Russ.). Pp. 83–97.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шрейдер П. Трансцендентный стиль в кино: Одзу, Брессон, Дрейер // Киноведческие записки. 1996. № 32. С. 182–200.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schrader P. (1996) Transtsedentalniy stil v kino: Ozu, Bresson, Dreyer [Transcendental style in film: Ozu, Bresson, Dreyer] // Kinovedcheskie Zapiski. 1996. No 32. Pp. 182–200 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
