<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">vgik</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник ВГИК</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Vestnik VGIK</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2074-0832</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2713-2471</issn><publisher><publisher-name>ВГИК</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">vgik-1010</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ПЕРФОРМАНС | ИСКУССТВО ВОПЛОЩЕНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>PERFORMANCE | THE ART OF PRESENTATION</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Актуальные проблемы композиции художественного изображения</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Actual Problems of the Composition of the Artistic Image</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Свешников</surname><given-names>А. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Sveshnikov</surname><given-names>Alexander V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2019</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>02</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>2(40)</issue><fpage>87</fpage><lpage>99</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Свешников А.В., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Свешников А.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Sveshnikov A.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vestnik-vgik.com/jour/article/view/1010">https://www.vestnik-vgik.com/jour/article/view/1010</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье рассматривается композиция изображения как особого текста, имеющего смысловое значение в контексте диалога художника и зрителя. Такой текст состоит из отдельных элементов — композитов с их сложной взаимосвязью, задающей особую последовательность восприятия. При организации целостной композиции возникает интегральный образный смысл, выходящий за рамки простой суммы изображенных элементов. Задача педагога — помочь студенту построить целостно организованный образ, что в корне отличается от обычного размещения изображения на листе.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This essay explores the general compositional features by opposingthe common understanding of composition as “an arrangement of the image onthe sheet surface”. An image is essentially a text that conveys information from theauthor to the viewer and has no meaning without them. The main premise is thata semantic compositional unit can be represented by the sequence “conveyor —image — perceiver”. It is shown that a pictorial text consists of separate elementswith a certain structure (experiments of R. Pritchard). These elements, in turn,are closely interrelated with each other, and only in this connection can theirartistic meaning be perceived. The perception of meaning is a temporal process,which is determined by the transition of gaze from one group of elements toanother. In different contexts and with a different “route” of perception, thesame group can carry different meanings. It is important that if the image doesnot carry any specific information for us it can nevertheless cause associationswhich mostly reflect our inner essence. In this case, the viewer can understandthe original general meaning of the work very subjectively, despite all the effortsof the author to show a clear structure of the image.In this regard, the compositional “routes” of the spectator's perception ofpictorial elements can differ greatly from one another, depending on the viewer'sinternal presets, which Alfred L. Yarbus proved experimentally back in the 1960s.The essay briefly discusses some properties of pictorial signs and their impactson the emotional sphere of a person.Finally, several pedagogical conclusions are made, in particular that theability of the student to penetrate into the symbolic artistic-semantic structurerequires education and development of his personality. Without this, he will onlyglean the surface, the material aspect of the image. That is why an unpreparedstudent is often fond of "illusionism", of copying. Only serious pedagogicalwork that requires knowledge of the fundamental principles of composite imageconstruction helps to cope with this.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>композиционная организация</kwd><kwd>изобразительный текст</kwd><kwd>композит</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>compositional organization</kwd><kwd>graphic text</kwd><kwd>composite</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лосев А.Ф. Проблема символа и реалистическое искусство. М.: Искусство, 1995. 320 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Losev A.F. Problema simvola i realisticheskoe iskusstvo [Symbol Problem and Realistic Art].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Свешников А.В. Алгоритмы композиционного мышления в станковой живописи. М.: ВГИК, 2012. 352 с.: ил.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1995. 320 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фаворский В.А. Литературно-теоретическое наследие. М.: Советский художник, 1988. 588 с.: ил.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sveshnikov A.V. Algoritmy kompozicionnogo myshleniya v stankovoj zhivopisi</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хогарт У. Анализ красоты. Л.: Искусство, 1987. 254 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[Algorithms of composite thinking in easel painting]. Moscow: VGIK, 2012. 352 p.: il.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Favorskij V.A. Literaturno-teoreticheskoe nasledie [Literary and theoretical heritage].</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Favorskij V.A. Literaturno-teoreticheskoe nasledie [Literary and theoretical heritage].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Moscow: Sovetskij hudozhnik, 1988. 588 p.: il.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Moscow: Sovetskij hudozhnik, 1988. 588 p.: il.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hogart U. Analiz krasoty [Beauty analysis]. L.: Iskusstvo, 1987. 254 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hogart U. Analiz krasoty [Beauty analysis]. L.: Iskusstvo, 1987. 254 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
